3/23/26

Liz May: SD Earth haters are a wreck

After the Soviet Union fell Republicans became Earth haters and began their war on the environment substituting a new Green Scare for the old Red Scare. 

Today, Liz May is a white christianic Earth hater who clearly ignores historical trauma and institutional racism but represents District 27 in South Dakota's demented legislature anyway and blames the victims of Manifest Destiny for being part of the Fourth World. At any rate, it sounds like Earth haters aren't getting along and in Watertown there was a big blowup at Friday’s SDGOP women's meeting.

This Isn’t About Republicans. It’s About How We Govern.
By Rep. Liz May
Before I get into the substance of this session, I want to share, I missed the first week of session this year due to a brain injury. The following week, I was only able to make it through a couple of days before needing to step back again. It wasn’t until after that I was able to push through and finish most of the session—though I ultimately missed the final week as well. It made for one of the hardest sessions I’ve experienced.
At the same time, it was also one of the most contentious. The infighting within our caucus made it even more challenging to stay focused and do the job I was sent there to do. I’ll be honest—I had moments where I had to work hard to keep my emotions in check. That’s not something I’m proud of, but it’s something I’ve learned over the years. Once words are said, you don’t get them back. And if I’m being real, my ancestral background reminds me I’ve got a little fire in me—I’ve had my share of moments. You either learn to manage it, or it manages you.
Through all of that, I never lost sight of one thing: it is an honor to serve the people of District 27. The folks back home didn’t elect me to be perfect—they elected me to be honest, to stay grounded, and to do the work, even when it’s hard.
When people look at the South Dakota Legislature today, they see something they’re not used to—Republicans disagreeing with each other, sometimes sharply. To some, it looks like division. To others, dysfunction. But what we’re actually seeing is something much deeper—and much more honest. The truth is, this isn’t a fight about personalities or even about conservatism itself. It’s a debate about what government is supposed to be.
The Republican Party is a political label. But what’s happening inside the legislature has very little to do with party—and everything to do with how each of us views the role of government. There are three primary governing philosophies at play, and understanding them is the key to understanding everything else.
The first is populism, often closely aligned with libertarian thinking. This group is driven by a deep skepticism of government. Their focus is on limiting it, resisting it, and questioning whether it should be involved at all. Their first question is simple: should government be doing this in the first place?
The second is conservatism. Historically, conservatism has included both limiting government and responsibly governing the institutions that exist. A true conservative does not reject government but believes it should be structured, stable, and accountable. Conservatism is about managing government responsibly—ensuring it functions properly, maintaining order, and improving systems where needed without tearing them down.
The third is what can best be described as expansion or growth-oriented thinking. This group views government as a tool. They are focused on using it to drive economic development, build infrastructure, expand services, and create outcomes.
All three of these philosophies exist within the same political party—and that’s why the conflict feels so sharp. These are not disagreements about being Republican. They are disagreements about what government should do.
You can see this divide in nearly every major issue. Taking money from one fund and redirecting it to another—some see that as economic growth, others see it as misuse. Regulating behavior in schools—some see it as protection, others see it as overreach. Funding nonprofits—some see it as meeting real needs, others see it as expanding government. These are not partisan disagreements. They are philosophical ones.
That same divide exists in how people interpret the South Dakota Republican Party platform. The platform emphasizes individual liberty, limited government, and personal responsibility—principles that strongly reflect populist and libertarian thinking. At the same time, it recognizes that government has essential functions that must be carried out—something rooted in conservatism. One philosophy reads the platform as a call to limit government wherever possible. Another reads it as a responsibility to govern effectively within defined limits. Both claim the platform—but they are not operating from the same understanding.
And right now, that tension is playing out in a very visible way. The populist wing—supported and amplified by outside voices, advocacy groups, and social media commentary—has had a significant influence on the tone and direction of the party. That influence is not always about governing. Often, it is about messaging, pressure, and defining who is or isn’t considered “conservative.”
Strong disagreement is expected in a legislative body, and no group is without fault. But when disagreement turns personal, it undermines the work for everyone. That shift in tone was evident this past session, where debate too often moved away from policy and toward confrontation.
I also want to share a personal perspective on the Freedom Caucus, because I had the opportunity to see it up close when it was first being formed in South Dakota. I was invited to attend an early meeting to consider joining. I listened carefully, and when I left that night, I asked that the national leadership reach out so I could better understand how the group operated. A few days later, I received that call. Toward the end of the conversation, I asked a simple question: would I be expected to vote the way the group directed? The answer I received was yes—that membership required voting with the group. That told me everything I needed to know. 
I’m a ranch girl, and I wasn’t elected to take orders—I was elected to use my judgment. The people I represent expect me to be honest, to think for myself, and to make decisions grounded in logic and common sense. We’re not going to get every vote right, but we won’t get any of them right if we’re just following someone else’s instructions.
That’s not how I believe this job should work. In my view, the Freedom Caucus—both in South Dakota and across the country—operates from a libertarian philosophy that prioritizes limiting government above all else. That approach helps explain much of the disruption and tone we saw this last session. It may work for some, but it’s not how I believe governing should be done.
The divide becomes even clearer when you look at the budget. Every year, we hear concerns about the size of government. But the legislature is only in session for about 40 days, while the executive branch operates year-round, building and administering the base budget long before we ever step into the appropriations room. By the time most legislators are reviewing the budget, much of it is already built. Limiting government is part of governing—but governing also requires deciding what must exist and making it function responsibly.
If the true concern is the size and growth of the general appropriations bill, then the focus has to be where that bill is actually built. That means spending less time bringing policy bills that add mandates and more time in the appropriations room—where budgets are reviewed line by line, questions are asked, and real changes can be made. That’s where outcomes are shaped. Raising objections on the final day may sound strong, but it doesn’t change the result. At that point, the work has already been done. If anything, it highlights a lack of engagement in the process itself. Governing requires more than commentary at the end—it requires showing up early, doing the work, and taking responsibility for the outcome.
When you look at the bills that were brought forward this session, many of the same voices calling for smaller government were also introducing legislation that expanded it. Bills like HB 1243 required schools to take on new mandates and even exposed the state to additional legal costs. Others, like HB 1241, added procedural requirements that increase administrative burden. Even when framed around rights or values, these bills still require enforcement, oversight, or compliance. Government doesn’t grow only through spending—it also grows through mandates, enforcement, and administrative requirements. You cannot say you are limiting government while consistently adding mandates to it.
Citizen engagement is important and necessary—but it is different from carrying the responsibility of governing. There is a growing trend of voices who follow the process from the outside and speak with certainty about how it should be done, without ever having to carry the responsibility of doing it. They reduce complex decisions to simple narratives and labels. Anyone can criticize a vote. Governing requires owning the outcome.
At the end of the day, this isn’t about factions in Pierre. It’s about the people back home. They’re not asking us to win arguments. They’re asking us to get it right.
We don’t need to eliminate disagreement. But we do need to be honest about it—and responsible in how we handle it. Because the future of this state won’t be decided by who is the loudest. It will be decided by who is willing to do the work.

Montana Libertarians field candidates for every federal office

Founded in 1979 the Montana Libertarian Party has been a factor in elections in the state for decades often stealing voters from Republicans and since this interested party left Montana in 2011 more Earth haters moved into the state making it ripe for another Copper King era

Over 100,000 new residents moved to Montana since 2018, contributing to a 2-to-1 Republican-leaning voter registration edge among new arrivals. This trend contributed to a sweep of statewide elections in 2024, including the defeat of incumbent Democratic Senator Jon Tester by Republican Tim Sheehy, a newcomer to politics. The 2024 election cycle cemented this change, and early candidate filings for 2026 indicate a further push by conservative state leadership to consolidate power, highlighting the ongoing, complex political realignment of Montana.

So, migrating Republicans from California and Washington State warp elections in Montana where conservatives in the eastern district detest Californians even as real estate values soar putting people in the margins who voted for the Orange Julius farther into the boonies where jobs are scarce. So, contradictory occurrences are making Montana politics very weird and rich catholic Californians in the Bitterroot Valley clash with rural eastern Montana-born Protestants.

The Montana Libertarian Party holds online Zoom gatherings for interested parties every Wednesday at 6:00 pm MST.
Libertarian candidate interest is up, party leaders say, and they expect voter interest could be too. The Libertarian ballot is full of candidates, all younger than 50 and none having previously run for office in Montana under the Libertarian banner. In the Western Congressional District, there are 10 candidates — five Democrats, three [Earth haters], an independent [sic] and a [L]ibertarian — lined up to replace retiring incumbent Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, who is not seeking reelection. All told, there are nine Libertarians on the Montana ballot in 2026, including five for the state Legislature: Dru Koester of Helena, J.C. Windmueller of Missoula, Dave Von Eschen of Great Falls, Jordan Ophus of Havre, and Greg DeVries of Jefferson City. [Montana Free Press]

3/22/26

Bayer is killing people

Roundup® is a threat to human life and is known to cause birth defects and spontaneous abortions despite assurances from manufacturer Bayer but high levels of glyphosate, a known endocrine disruptor, are still found in oats, chickpeas and corn sugars. In February Bayer and attorneys for cancer patients announced a proposed $7.25 billion settlement to resolve thousands of lawsuits alleging the company failed to warn people that Roundup® causes cancer. More than 60,000 active lawsuits remain, with new cases still being filed.

3/21/26

Hit on Epstein an open secret

Newly released US Department of Justice documents from March 2026 highlighted a $5,000 cash deposit made to Tova Noel, one of the prison guards assigned to monitor Jeffrey Epstein approximately 10 days before his death in 2019. The $5,000 was part of roughly 12 deposits totaling over $11,000, according to reports.

Trump wants to disenfranchise Native voters

Donald Trump hates Indigenous Americans so here are more reasons Democrats and American Indians need to vote in midterm elections

Fueled by Trump's racism US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol agents have wrongfully stopped, detained, and interrogated Native Americans during raids even though they are US citizens and because of the unlawful treatment of Indians activists are calling for documentation to be carried for protection.
Chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), is voicing opposition to the SAVE America Act, legislation being aggressively pushed by the Trump administration. For Indigenous voters, she said, several provisions in the SAVE Act would pose significant challenges. While tribal identification cards may be accepted for voting, she noted they would not qualify for voter registration. She also cited the long distances to travel to register to vote would prevent some to do so. The law, which requires proof of citizenship for federal registration, invalidates many Tribal IDs, creating severe burdens for rural Alaskans, say advocates, noting that only six election offices exist in the state. [Native News Online]

The SAVE Act would require Americans to drive, fly, or even take a ferry to exercise their constitutional right to vote. Alaskan Senator Murkowski explains:

[image or embed]

— Center for American Progress (@americanprogress.bsky.social) March 20, 2026 at 1:44 PM

3/19/26

Earth haters were granted categorical exclusion to drill near Pe'Sla



Over twenty years ago Congress passed the Tribal Forest Protection Act when this columnist was still living in the Black Hills. It authorized tribal nations to enter agreements with the Departments of Interior and Agriculture to protect public resources bordering or adjacent to reservations and trust lands that have biological, archaeological, historical, or cultural connections. 

Then in 2012 the Sicangu Lakota Oyate or Rosebud Sioux Tribe raised some $10 million combined with contributions from the other members of the Oceti Sakowin the People of the Seven Council Fires purchased Pe'Sla, the property formerly called Reynold's Prairie by the descendants of white settlers. In 2014 the Nations acquired the final 437 acres of the Heart of Everything That Is and in 2015 the Oyates began moving bison to the meadow with hopes to add many more after winning federal trust status but in 2020 the herd of sixty five was removed after whining from welfare ranchers who lease Forest Service land for domestic cattle grazing for pennies per head.
But on Feb. 27, the U.S. Forest Service approved an exploratory drilling project directly adjacent to Pe’ Sla and on the Rapid Creek Watershed, putting the land’s ecosystem, water and Native ceremonial sites at risk. The plan approved by the U.S. Forest Service Mystic Ranger District in February says the company will drill up to 18 holes, 3 inches in diameter and 1,000 feet deep, vertically or at an angle up to 45 degrees. The project is estimated to last less than a year. On this condition, the Forest Service granted Pete Lien & Sons a categorical exclusion. This waived the requirement of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement, which would identify any environmental effects the proposed project could have and extend the public and tribal consultation period. [Drilling project moves forward in the heart of the Black Hills]
Preservation is a weak spot in the Republican agenda and if enough people believe forest and rangeland resilience is a bankable position the South Dakota Democratic Party needs to exploit it by fielding candidates who can convince voters to reject politicians like John Thune, Marty Jackley, Mike Rounds and Dusty Johnson who work for the grazing, mining and logging profiteers at the expense of public lands.

Wildfires in the Black Hills continue to test local fire departments and the Central Hills are under a red flag warning for Thursday and Friday.

3/18/26

South Dakota among least innovative states again

You can say one thing about the SDGOP. You don't have to have to raise money if you fail to accomplish anything whatsoever.
Now you hear that the Freedom Caucus is the "enemy" and that Pat Powers, AFP, Jen Beving, Scott Odenbach, and company are the "good folks," fighting the conservative fight. Ok, then. Whether you fall for that brand of bullshit, or not, is up to you. South Dakota ranks 3rd in the nation for political corruption, not because people here are stupid, but because the majority are so nice, so well meaning and altruistic that they can't possibly believe that their neighbors and elected leaders have been convinced to betray them. [Shad Olson]
Most & Least Innovative States

Because of talent flight and brain drain in 2023 South Dakota was among the least innovative states, ranked 50th in venture capital spending per capita, 47th in R&D spending and 51st in share of tech companies. 

In 2024 South Dakota dropped to 49th in financial literacy and 50th in financial knowledge and education despite the Republican former governor's pathological Pollyannaism. The state was the 43rd best economy in the US, 51st in percentage of businesses owned by women and 50th in innovation potential. 

In 2025 WalletHub's surveys revealed South Dakota was 40th in innovation but 50th in its share of technology companies and 48th in R&D spending per capita.

Today, the horrible red state is 41st in innovation, 45th in human capital rank, 47th in innovation environment and 50th in share of technology companies.

South Dakota Earth hater Will Mortenson outlines how red state failure is a feature in Pierre.
Not Enough Focus on the Future
From our budget to our regulations to our tax policy, we are increasingly focused on preservation of the present rather than building for the future. There is a lot of talk about kids in the Capitol, but there is no real vision or overarching plan for how South Dakota will be better for them than it was for us. There has been a decline in decorum, and no real consequences, since leadership turns over every term. This is a problem that seems to be getting worse, not better. If you’re trying to change the way things have always been done, you’ve got to have a well-considered, well-supported plan, because the status quo is hard to break. You get to witness some truly bizarre behavior. [Mortenson]
Learn more at Stateline News.

3/16/26

AFBF: more red state farmers headed to the shitter

Ag producers have destroyed shelter belts to plant industrial crops that deplete aquifers and now drought is blowing toxin-laden topsoil into downwind states. Spring wildfire seasons have begun in Nebraska, eastern Colorado, western Kansas, the panhandles of Oklahoma, Texas and other Republican-held areas where moral hazard and poor ranching practices routinely decimate the high plains

And, as the Trump Organization wars against its own constituency, ends environmental protection and ag bankers enslave landowners more farmers are headed for bankruptcy. The number of farms filing for bankruptcy increased in 2025 after the relative prosperity during the Biden years according to the American Farm Bureau Federation.
Economists say the increase in filings is due to a combination of rising operational costs on the farm, such as fertilizer and machinery, and low crop prices that are putting pressure on farmers. Farm bankruptcy filings are typically a lagging indicator that farmers are facing financial distress. [More American farmers are filing for bankruptcy. Here’s why]
Learn more at Brownfield News.

3/12/26

Operation Epstein Fury causing fertilizer heartburn for welfare farmers

We, the People get much of our fertilizer from Morocco, Belarus and through the Persian Gulf but Trump tariffs and Hurricane Ida in the Gulf of Mexico slowed the movement of product to markets up and down the Mississippi River. Nitrogen fertilizer is normally applied to subsidized crops then ends right back in the Gulf of Mexico where it kills whole ecosystems. 

Now, Herr Trump's deflection from his history of raping little girls is taking its toll on the people who voted for him.
But with farmers already dealing with high fertilizer prices, even before the conflict in Iran, farmers are searching for a longer-term solution. Fertilizer market analysts warn while there are several options longer-term, there is no single fix for high fertilizer prices, only a mix of short-term policy responses and long-term investments that could gradually stabilize supply. Companies reportedly included in the investigation are Nutrien, The Mosaic Company, CF Industries Holdings, Koch Industries and Yara International, firms that collectively represent a significant share of the U.S. nitrogen, phosphate and potash fertilizer markets. [Farm Journal]
Koch is one of four corporations that control the production and sale of nitrogen-based fertilizer in the US. The others are Yara-USA, CF Industries and Nutrien so the Family Farm Action Alliance, a 501c3 non-profit group has asked the Department of Justice to investigate the avaricious rises in fertilizer prices. Chemical Ag gives loads of cash to Earth haters like John Thune.
October 26, 2022

Wade Christopherson 

Nutrien Ag Solutions 

806 W Broadway 

Vermillion, SD 57069

Dear Mr. Christopherson,

On October 18, 2022, the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (DANR) conducted a Restricted Use Dealer Record Audit at Nutrien Ag Solutions in Vermillion, SD. DANR’s audit found that restricted use products were sold to unlicensed applicators. Such violations are a Class 2 misdemeanor subject to civil penalties of up to $5,000 per offense and/or suspension or revocation of a license.
Mr. Christopherson is married to Stephanie Rissler who is Chair of the South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Pollute Commission.

Yes, the grassland fire danger index will reach the extreme category again Thursday for most of the horrible red state of South Dakota.

3/11/26

Guest post: Huffineses tied to child rapists

Editor's note: Earth hater Don Huffines is reportedly catholic and a self-described Trump Republican who receives endorsements from actors like Senator Rafael (Ted) Cruz and former Congressman Matt Gaetz who like Jeffrey Epstein is also a serial child rapist.


Jeffrey Epstein's Ranch That Was Never Searched Is Now Owned by a Man Who Funds Newborn Heart-Cell Harvesting
And his son Russell Huffines is in the Trump administration.
By Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez
Last week, I published the first and second installments of a four-part series I’ve written in which I follow the money related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch which, alone among the dead pedophile’s many properties was never investigated or searched, despite being the largest of them all, largely because the federal government under Donald J. Trump intervened to halt state investigations, and the state, under then-attorney general Hector Balderas, complied. Then everyone let the matter die with Epstein in 2019.
In Part One, I described how child rapist and trafficker Jeffrey Epstein used his “Zorro Trust” company to buy a 7500-acre tract of land here in New Mexico in 1993 from a politically connected New Mexico family drowning in debt; how he renamed it “Zorro Ranch” used it for years as a documented site of child rape, trafficking, and possible murder; and how two days after he began serving his 2008 prison sentence, an entity called the Zorro Trust won $85 million in the Oklahoma Powerball.
In Part Two, I traced the threads of that lottery win through a web of interconnected figures — a lottery official with a pattern of approving suspicious anonymous trust claims, a convenience store chain whose owner had ties to Ronald Perelman (who printed Oklahoma's lottery tickets and appears in Epstein's black book), and a Dallas bank board that connects directly to Donald Blaine and Mary Catherine Huffines, patriarch and matriarch of the wealthy Texas family that bought the ranch from Epstein’s estate in 2023. Huffines had tried to keep his identity secret vis-a-vis owning the ranch, but he was outed last month by Clara Bates, a reporter at the Santa Fe New Mexican newspaper.
Today we go deeper into the Huffines family, to find out who they are, and to see if there are any more connections to be drawn between the previous owner of the ranch, and the current one.
Spoiler alert: There are.
First, the Basics:
Donald Blaine Huffines, born in 1958, is a Dallas real estate developer, investor, and multimillionaire who served in the Texas State Senate from 2015 to 2019, where he distinguished himself as one of the most conservative members of that body — no small feat in Texas.
Don (we’ll be talking about a lot of Huffines here, so I’ll use first-names) lost his re-election bid in 2018, then ran for governor in 2022, challenging incumbent Greg Abbott — from the right. Yep. Don thinks Abbott, who is about as far right as you can go without meeting Hitler, is too liberal.
Don lost that race too.
Don is currently the Republican nominee for Texas Comptroller — the office that serves as the state's chief financial officer, responsible for collecting taxes, managing the state treasury, and overseeing how Texas spends its money. He has the endorsement of Donald Trump. He won the primary on March 3, 2026.
And back in 2023, he bought Zorro Ranch in secret, named it San Rafael Ranch, and began doing massive excavations and constructions there, some of it — possibly all of it — without proper permits. This, despite witness reports that at least two girls were raped to death there, and buried on the grounds. This, despite aerial shots showing that the ranch had its own industrial-grade landfill, which is not normal for a ranch. This, despite one retired police officer’s concern that there was what appeared to be a crematorium on site, and a barn with prison doors. And as for the new name? It’s impossible to know whether Don knew, at the time the new name was chosen, that Saint Raphael is the patron saint of youth, ordained marriages, and miraculous healings and resurrections of lost fortunes.
Take a look at Zorro Ranch before the Huffines bought it, and after. This is not simple landscaping. This is a massive excavation on a ranch where witnesses say the bodies of at least two girls who were raped to death are buried.
With the release of 3.5 million new pages of Epstein files by the U.S. Dept. of Justice in January 2026, New Mexico lawmakers grew concerned by these allegations, and by the lack of investigation at the ranch. The state has created and funded an Epstein Survivors Truth Commission to pick up the ball dropped by former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas when he halted all investigation in 2019 because the feds told him to. Whether any evidence is left on site is yet to be discovered.
But if there isn’t anything left, that will be due in part to the secretive and illegal actions of its new owner, Don — and a whole hell of a lot of other people, too.
A Company Called HEST
Though he’s best known as a guy who builds tract home subdivisions and buys ranches from the estates of pedophiles who knew his friends, Don Huffines also runs a venture capital family office called HEST Investments — which stands, formally, for Huffines Enterprises Science & Technology. A couple of weeks ago, when you googled the company name, their official website was the first thing you found. Now? It has been buried and can’t be found at all unless you specifically search for “official website,” and even then it’s not the homepage.
Somebody done scrubbed it for ‘em.
Wonder why.
They also scrubbed the TEAM page. Well, deleted it. Before they did this, it showed that Don’s son Russell co-ran the company with him. You know, Russell. The Associate Director of Agency Outreach in the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs under U.S. President Donald J. Trump, a position he has held since June 2025, which gives the Huffines family a direct line into the executive branch of the United States government at the exact moment that government is overseeing — or choosing not to oversee — the investigation into what happened at the ranch his father bought from Epstein’s estate.
Let aaaaallll of that land.
HEST Investments, meanwhile, focuses on health technology, life sciences, biotech, and cybersecurity, with Don Huffines describing the firm’s philosophy as being about seeing “beyond the obvious” and investing in ventures with “the potential to make a transformative impact for humanity.” That language — transformative impact for humanity — carries a particular charge when you understand who else used almost identical language to describe his science investments, and what he was actually funding.
Jeffrey fucking Epstein.
The Science Epstein Loved:
Epstein spent the last two decades of his life positioning himself as a science philanthropist. His foundation funneled money into Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, MIT’s Media Lab, and transhumanist organizations, presenting himself as a visionary patron of human advancement. What he was actually advancing, according to the documentary record, was something far darker: a sustained obsession with eugenics dressed up in the language of science.
Epstein told at least one fellow eugenicist that he hoped to freeze his brain and his penis at death, so his organs could be revived for future use in transhumanism. Multiple sources told the New York Times that he described plans to use his New Mexico ranch to impregnate dozens of women at a time, to seed the human race with his genetics. We already know from the DOJ files that at least one girl was imprisoned at Zorro Ranch, impregnated by Epstein multiple times, and forced to hand her newborn over to Ghislaine Maxwell at birth. The “baby ranch” was not merely an aspiration. There is evidence it was operational. Consider, for a moment, that Sabrina Bittencourt, a whistleblower in a similar baby farm in Brazil who named Epstein as running the same kind of operation in the United States, wound up “committing suicide” days after she said she’d hired bodyguards because of death threats.
Epstein’s foundation also paid the salary of the vice chairman of the World Transhumanist Association, a group whose stated goal is “to deeply influence a new generation of thinkers who dare to envision humanity’s next steps.” He funded George Church, the Harvard geneticist who developed an app to match people based on genetic fitness. He bankrolled the Edge Foundation, the intellectual salon that brought together Silicon Valley’s most powerful men for what were called Billionaires’ Dinners — from which women were systematically excluded, and at which Epstein’s teenage victims were kept out of the photographs.
The throughline of all of it was this: Epstein believed certain people — people like him — were biologically superior, and that science was the mechanism by which that superiority could be propagated and preserved.
Now look at what Don and Russell Huffines are funding.
The Neonatal Question:
Secretome Therapeutics, a Huffines-funded biotech company, is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing therapies derived from neonatal cardiac progenitor cells — cells harvested from the hearts of newborns under thirty days old — for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. The company’s lead asset, STM-01, received FDA Fast Track designation in March 2025 for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
HEST Investments led a $1.8 million special purpose vehicle investment in Secretome Therapeutics in September 2024. Don Huffines announced the investment personally, saying it “aligns perfectly with our vision of driving innovation and changing the perspective of how we advance human health.”
I want to be precise here, because precision matters: Secretome Therapeutics states explicitly that its cells are sourced from ethically consented neonatal cardiac tissue collected during medically necessary surgeries in full-term newborns treated for congenital heart defects, and that it does not use embryonic stem cells or tissue derived from elective terminations. I am not alleging that Secretome is doing anything illegal or unethical. I am reporting a fact: the man who bought Epstein’s ranch — the man whose son now works in Donald Trump’s White House — has invested in a company that harvests and develops therapies from the hearts of newborns. I’m noting, too, that there are only three scientists in the world who specialize in this research, and one of them, Eric Olsen, appears twice in the Epstein files.
And I am noting that Jeffrey Epstein’s documented scientific obsessions included the biological manipulation of human reproduction and development, the harvesting and preservation of biological material, and a sustained interest in what he called improving the human species. He funded scientists working at the intersection of genetics, longevity, and human enhancement. He dreamed, documented in writing, of a world shaped by his biology.
The question I cannot answer — but that investigators with subpoena power could — is whether Epstein’s interest in this specific field of science, and the Huffines family’s investment in a company working in it, are merely two unrelated facts that happen to sit in close proximity. Given everything else we’ve established in this series, I do not think that question is unreasonable to ask.
Nor do I think it is unreasonable to note that the company’s name, which describes the part of the neonatal cardiac cell to be used, is also a homophone for Secret Home, created by a family that bought Zorro Ranch and tried to use the law to avoid anyone knowing who they were, the same family that, as soon as news broke that they owned it, had HEST’s website scrubbed, deleted and hidden, too.
If they have nothing to hide, one wonders, why are they hiding it?
The Other HEST Bets:
Secretome is not HEST’s only investment. HEST has also made a $1 million strategic investment in American Binary, a post-quantum encryption company, which the firm described as “a significant step towards fortifying digital security as civilization moves toward the quantum computing era.” HEST has additionally invested in Valerion, a battery technology company based at the University of Michigan.
The portfolio, taken together, reads like a particular kind of ambition: control over biological raw material, control over energy infrastructure, control over the encryption layer of the digital world. These are not random bets. They are bets on the chokepoints of the next century.
The Ground Is Being Changed:
While the Truth Commission was getting organized this past February, aerial photographs showed something disturbing at the former Zorro Ranch: the helipad and surrounding grounds had been extensively excavated by the Huffines, leaving a deep, open scar in the earth. Witnesses in the DOJ files alleged that two “foreign girls” were raped and murdered at Epstein’s direction and buried somewhere in the hills of the ranch.
State and county officials ordered the Huffines to halt construction after determining work had begun on a new front gate featuring concrete turrets without proper permits. The Huffines’ stated explanation was that they planned to develop the property into a Christian retreat. But there was no paper trail indicating any such thing.
New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez has since announced the state is reopening its investigation, and the Truth Commission — which holds subpoena power and includes a former prosecutor and a retired FBI agent among its four members — has held its first meeting.
A makeshift memorial placed at the ranch’s entrance by community members, bearing crosses and photographs of Epstein’s known victims, was removed this week by persons unknown. Under New Mexico state law, the destruction of a roadside memorial is a criminal offense. Whoever removed it may be on video.
The ground at what used to be Zorro Ranch is being disturbed. Some of that disturbance is institutional, legal, and overdue. Some of it, apparently, is being done by the new owners with a backhoe and no permits.
Who Are These People, Exactly?
Don Huffines presents himself with the polish of a man who has spent decades curating a brand. His campaign website describes him as a “fifth-generation Texan, husband, father of five, grandfather of twelve, courageous MAGA Republican, and self-made businessman,” guided by “faith, family, and freedom.” He talks about God. He talks about Texas. He posts everything — Mar-a-Lago dinners, ribbon cuttings, handshakes with senators, all of it documented in real time for the faithful to admire.
Let’s start with the “self-made” part.
Don Huffines’ grandfather founded Huffines Motor Company in 1924. His father, James Lecil “J.L.” Huffines Jr., built that automotive empire into a dynasty of North Texas car dealerships, ran two Dallas banks as president, served on the Texas A&M Board of Regents by gubernatorial appointment, endowed cancer research chairs at UT Southwestern Medical School — and, the detail conspicuously absent from his son’s campaign biography, was a minority partner of H.R. “Bum” Bright in the ownership of the Dallas Cowboys football team. Don Huffines graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a BBA in Finance, co-founded Huffines Communities with his twin brother Phillip in 1985, and has spent his career building on the family name, the family money, and the family network that his father spent a lifetime constructing. He is as self-made as his bed. Which is to say: someone else made it, and he just gets to sleep in it.
Which makes the Moscow trip all the more interesting.
In August 2018, then Dallas state Senator Donald Huffines, along with his twin brother (yes, folks, there are TWO of them) and former Dallas County Republican Party Chair Phillip Huffines -- and, inexplicably, Don's wife Mary Catherine -- spent much of a Monday in Russia meeting with senior Russian officials. It wasn’t a publicized trip — both brothers’ social media accounts were completely silent about the excursion. The only reason anyone found out was because wire photos started coming across the AP feed, showing the Huffines twins seated across a conference table from Russian senators — images taken by Russian state media and distributed by the Russian government. Rand Paul, who had organized the trip, was also in the photos.
Naturally, most of the photos of this trip that existed last week online have been scrubbed. But not all of them.
Among the Russian officials at the table was Sergey Kislyak, the former Russian ambassador to the United States — a central figure in Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible ties between the Russian government and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
The same day the news broke, Don Huffines’ Facebook page featured a video of him practicing to throw out the first pitch at a Rangers game. Not a word about Moscow.
When caught, his office reached for an explanation. His chief of staff told reporters that Huffines had gone to Russia because “Don Huffines regularly hears from Texans who are concerned about the security of our elections, and who are alarmed by Russia’s efforts to undermine our democratic institutions.” He had flown to Moscow, the story went, to look the Russians in the eye and tell them not to meddle in Texas elections.
Let that breathe for a moment. Don Huffines is a state senator from Dallas. He builds tract housing in the suburbs. He has no foreign policy portfolio, no intelligence briefing, no diplomatic standing. An SMU political science professor noted at the time that Huffines was “talking to the wrong people — Putin and his national security services are doing the messing. Russian legislators don’t have a lot of control over President Putin.” The U.S. Embassy in Moscow disavowed the trip entirely, describing it as a private group visit, not official diplomacy.
So a Dallas real estate developer and state senator, who usually posts his every public movement on his Instagram account, flies to Moscow in secret with his twin brother, sits down with Russian officials including the former ambassador implicated in the Mueller investigation, says nothing publicly until Russian state media publishes the photographs — and his explanation is that millions of Texans were worried about election integrity, and he personally went to fix it.
This is the same man who told the public, seven years later, when Clara Bates of the Santa Fe New Mexican found his wife’s name buried in a tax protest document and exposed the family’s secret purchase of Epstein’s ranch, that the whole thing was perfectly innocent — that they had simply, aw shucks, bought themselves a nice Christian retreat out in the New Mexico desert. Only problem is there is exactly zero paper trail to indicate the Huffines had any such plans, though they’re likely to create one now, after the fact.
Two cover stories. Two explanations that rely on the audience not asking obvious follow-up questions.
The Family:
Don and Mary Catherine Huffines (maiden name Myers) have been married 37 years and have five children: Colin, Devin, Terence, Deirdre, and Russell. Mary Catherine is the quieter half of the public partnership — a Dallas philanthropist who appears in society pages and charity event roundups. She is also the woman whose name, on page 78 of an 87-page tax protest filing, unraveled the entire fiction of the anonymous ranch purchase. She is listed in court filings as the trustee of the LLC whose acquisition of what used to be Zorro Ranch was structured to keep the family’s identities completely secret. She is the person who signed.
Colin co-manages the family’s real estate ventures. An earlier version of New Mexico’s public business filings listed Colin Huffines as manager of San Rafael One LLC, the entity linked to the ranch — until earlier this year, when his name quietly disappeared from the filing. This is a family about whom the silences and erasures are often more revealing than what’s visible. An anonymous LLC, a vanishing name in a public record, a road renamed, a memorial removed by persons unknown, an invisible trip to Russia. The Huffines don’t erase things carelessly. They erase things deliberately, and they do it until someone catches them.
Devin is the one who followed the family template most faithfully. He played defensive back for the University of Texas Longhorns for four years, earning Academic All-Big 12 honors twice, then earned his BBA in Finance from UT Austin — the same degree his father holds, the same degree his brother Russell would later earn at the same school. After a stint as a junior broker at CBRE, he landed at Four Rivers Capital, a Dallas private equity and development firm, where he has been a senior associate since 2017. He married Katie Snyder, an Alabama sorority world alumna who worked as a publicist for the Panhellenic society before transitioning to social media management — a woman whose entire professional formation has been in the management of image and institutional reputation. Their wedding, documented on a videographer’s YouTube channel, featured a live reindeer brought in for the occasion. The reindeer looked like it would rather be anywhere else. Russell gave the toast. You can see the whole family in the footage — tanned, pressed, smiling in the way that people smile when the photographer is watching.
Deirdre, now Deirdre Hairston, is the daughter who became a minor far-right celebrity during the pandemic. She was presented at the 60th International Debutante Ball at the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City in 2014 — one of the most elite social rituals in American aristocratic life. In March 2021, she was escorted out of Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Dallas by police for refusing to wear a mask while kneeling in prayer with her baby, pregnant with her second child. The story went viral almost immediately, laundered through the right-wing media ecosystem as the spontaneous martyrdom of a random Dallas mom. She appeared on Steve Bannon’s “War Room: Pandemic” podcast and on the video channel of a prominent traditionalist Catholic commentator to tell her story. What those audiences were not told was that her father had been one of the first elected officials in Texas to call for an end to pandemic restrictions, that he had spoken at protests outside the governor’s mansion demanding the state reopen, and that his office had commented approvingly on his daughter’s podcast interview on his own Facebook page. Too convenient. Too on the nose. Too connected to the levers of power to be accidental.
Terence is, from a storytelling perspective, the most interesting of the five — precisely because he appears to have made at least some effort to be something other than his father. He has a SoundCloud page where he posts his original compositions: house music, trancey, saxophone-threaded, the kind of sound that drifts toward sensitivity and interiority rather than dominance and spectacle. He seems to have been drawn toward libertarianism — not a raging rebellion, but perhaps the ideological pressure valve available to a freethinking temperament born into an authoritarian household.
That said, Terence has not exactly been roughing it. Getty Images archives show him attending the 62nd International Debutante Ball at The Pierre Hotel in New York City on December 29, 2016 — an event whose ticket prices run to $22,000 a plate, whose guest list includes daughters of presidents, ambassadors, billionaires, and European nobility. Also documented at the surrounding festivities: Don and Mary Catherine themselves, attending the bachelors brunch at P.J. Clarke’s, along with Russell. The whole family was there, dressed to the nines, embedded in exactly the kind of Manhattan elite social world that Don Huffines’ MAGA base in Texas — the ones who picture him as a golly-gee bootstrapper in a cowboy hat fighting the coastal elites — has been told to despise.
Russell, meanwhile, is not merely a young man who once worked at a family investment office and sold fireworks. He is, as of June 2025, a White House official — seated inside the executive branch, in an office whose function is to manage the relationship between the White House and the federal agencies. Including, potentially, the agencies that would be responsible for any meaningful federal investigation of what happened in the hills of a New Mexico ranch that his family purchased in secret and started excavating without permits.
I keep returning to the shape of this family. A patriarch who flies to Moscow in secret to meet with officials including the man at the center of the Mueller investigation, and whose cover story embarrasses the U.S. Embassy. A wife who is the legal trustee of the shell company that bought Epstein's ranch. A son who quietly vanishes from a public LLC filing the moment journalists start asking questions. A daughter deployed as a sympathetic media figure in a disinformation campaign whose beneficiary was her father. A son posting saxophone house music to SoundCloud while his family dances at The Pierre. A son in the White House. And a family venture capital firm that is actively investing in therapies harvested from the hearts of newborns under thirty days old — the same category of human biological material that Jeffrey Epstein, the previous owner of their ranch, spent years and millions of dollars dreaming about controlling.
In the final installment of this series, I’ll follow the money one last time — to its logical and terrifying conclusion: what the full picture of the network described across these four parts suggests about who is actually protecting it, and what it would take to make them stop.
Photo of the whole fecund Huffines klan - er, clan.


The New Mexico Legislature established a bipartisan Epstein Truth Commission with a $2 million budget to investigate past criminal activity at the former Zorro Ranch and why local authorities failed to act sooner.

Contextual Information Regarding "Newborn Heart-Cell Harvesting" Claims:
  • Reports surrounding the sale and the "Epstein files" have noted Epstein's interest in transhumanism, specifically his desire to seed the human race with his own DNA at his ranch, which he referred to as a "baby-making factory" or "baby ranch".
  • Documents and reports indicate that Epstein funded various scientific researches, including projects related to genetic engineering (CRISPR), which led to speculation and reporting regarding potential unethical research, including "baby farming" or "baby harvesting," though specific claims about the new owner personally funding "newborn heart-cell harvesting" are not substantiated in the provided search results.