Field surveys in 2022 and 2023 documented open gates, downed fences, unauthorized cattle and extensive damage to the Gila River’s riparian vegetation, where up to 92% of the surveyed critical habitat for the cuckoo and flycatcher was significantly damaged by livestock grazing. The Center filed two notices of intent to sue the agencies following the surveys but grazing continued. Unauthorized grazing and its damage to the protected birds’ habitat violates earlier Endangered Species Act approvals for the seven grazing allotments. In the desert Southwest, livestock grazing harms threatened and endangered wildlife and is the primary driver of riparian ecosystem degradation. [Lawsuit Targets Cattle Grazing Damage to Endangered Wildlife Habitat on Arizona’s Gila River]Earlier this year American Rivers released its annual list of most endangered rivers in the United States naming five at-risk western waterways but isn’t every watershed in the Mountain West threatened, if not endangered?
11/5/23
Groups sue BLM and USFWS over continued damage to Gila River
11/4/23
YNP, Earth haters clash over phantom disease transmission
Yellowstone’s Lead Bison Biologist Chris Geremia told officials at the meeting that a harsh winter brought more than 1,000 animals outside of the park into the Gardiner Basin. The herd was reduced by around 25 percent: more than 1000 of them were removed by the tribal and state hunt, 282 were entered into a program that transfers bison to tribal nations, and 88 bison were slaughtered, their meat and hides given to tribes. IBMP voting member and Custer Gallatin National Forest Supervisor Mary Erickson, says from her vantage point having served on the IBMP for the past 16 years, bison management has always been complex and controversial, but over the years the group has made a lot of progress. [Yellowstone Public Radio]The feds should buy out landowners unwilling to lease for wildlife corridors. Unless the West embraces rewilding on portions of the Missouri River basin west of a north/south line from Oacoma, South Dakota through the CM Russell National Wildlife Refuge to Yellowstone National Park then to the Yukon water wars will clog the courts leaving violent armed vigilantism to settle disputes.
In my latest column, I write that Gov. Gianforte is trying to bully Yellowstone National Park into killing more bison.https://t.co/K4N10ROsot
— Darrell Ehrlick (@DarrellEhrlick) October 19, 2023
11/3/23
USACE nearing Dakota Excess pipeline decision
As a matter of sovereignty, honor, and respect for the Standing Rock Sioux Nation, we must demand that the Dakota Access Pipeline be shut down. NOW.
— Native Organizers Alliance (@NativeOrganizer) November 2, 2023
Tap the link to learn more and to send in a comment regarding DAPL: https://t.co/vHed52ZRtF#NoDAPL #waterislife pic.twitter.com/GogmjzxWW2
11/2/23
Feds pouring more money into hole in South Dakota
“We’re thrilled about DOE’s recent funding announcement for the Center for Understanding Subsurface Signals and Permeability experiment,” said Dr. Jaret Heise, science director at SURF. “We are very happy to garner interest from the DOE’s Energy Earthshots Initiative and to play a role in developing our nation’s energy independence with CUSSP. We are also grateful for the hard work of previous groups of scientists at SURF who opened the door to this new era of energy research here at America’s deep underground laboratory,” says Heise. [Geothermal research at SURF takes leap forward with DOE Energy Earthshots initiative]Now, the scientists and scholars repopulating Lawrence County could test anchored Republicans. Maybe.
SD EPSCoR was onsite at @SanfordLab last week and WOW to the amazing projects they have going on there like this #DarkMatter undertaking👨🔬https://t.co/xPAk6StCSR
— South Dakota EPSCoR (@SDEPSCoR) October 31, 2023
11/1/23
Scholars reinforce arguments in Disqualification Clause
With pristine clarity, Professor Laurence H. Tribe and Dennis Aftergut explain in this @USATODAY essay the compelling case for disqualification of the former president from future "office . . . under the United States" under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment: Simply, he rebelled "against the Constitution of the United States" when, in violation of the Constitution's Executive Vesting Clause, he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that he had lost that election and the American People had voted instead to confer the Executive power upon his successor, now-President Joseph Biden. This is the issue -- and the only issue -- before the courts in Colorado and Minnesota this week: Did the former president "rebel" against "the Constitution of the United States" when he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election. [Judge J. Michael Luttig]And.
The authors of Section 3 recognized that another run at office by anyone who had tried to overturn an election in violation of the oath could end the republic. That leaves a paramount question for the courts to answer concerning Trump. What does it mean to engage in “insurrection or rebellion against” the Constitution? It’s important to notice what can be easily missed: The text of Section 3 says exactly that – the disqualifying misconduct is rebellion against the Constitution. That kind of subversion of a fundamental tenet of the Constitution is precisely what the 14th Amendment has to mean by “insurrection or rebellion against” it, the very definition of disqualifying conduct under Section 3. [Ban Trump from 2024 ballot? Why courts should rule he can't serve as president again.]Learn more at the Colorado Newsline.
Trump got one step closer to being barred from the ballot as arguments began today in a Colorado suit to disqualify him under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment.
— Robert Reich (@RBReich) October 30, 2023
The Minnesota Supreme Court will hear a similar case on Thursday.
Here's what it boils down to: pic.twitter.com/ylr4WdGZgF