11/5/23

Groups sue BLM and USFWS over continued damage to Gila River

In 2018 the Saudi Ministry of Energy and Agriculture banned the use of groundwater for alfalfa production and in August of 2022 the Democratic candidate for Arizona Attorney General, now AG Kris Mayes called for an investigation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's sweetheart deal to pump Phoenix's reserves for free. But in April, after draining fragile aquifers and lobbying for more water from the Gila River Arizona revoked irrigation permits for KSA.

Industry and agriculture threaten rivers in the East while grazing and mining are killing waterways in the West so the Gila was the most endangered in 2019 because of livestock pollution.
Field surveys in 2022 and 2023 documented open gates, downed fences, unauthorized cattle and extensive damage to the Gila River’s riparian vegetation, where up to 92% of the surveyed critical habitat for the cuckoo and flycatcher was significantly damaged by livestock grazing. The Center filed two notices of intent to sue the agencies following the surveys but grazing continued. Unauthorized grazing and its damage to the protected birds’ habitat violates earlier Endangered Species Act approvals for the seven grazing allotments. In the desert Southwest, livestock grazing harms threatened and endangered wildlife and is the primary driver of riparian ecosystem degradation. [Lawsuit Targets Cattle Grazing Damage to Endangered Wildlife Habitat on Arizona’s Gila River]
Earlier this year American Rivers released its annual list of most endangered rivers in the United States naming five at-risk western waterways but isn’t every watershed in the Mountain West threatened, if not endangered?

Tribal nations including the Gila River Indian Community will receive part of $233 million from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act to restore 600,000 acre feet of their allotment of the lower Colorado River stolen through colonization.

11/4/23

YNP, Earth haters clash over phantom disease transmission

American Prairie (APR) near Malta in north-central Montana got its first bison from Wind Cave National Park in occupied South Dakota in 2005. 

The group hopes to have native animals grazing on some 5000 square miles or about 3.2 million acres of private land including 63,000A. in Phillips County connected with corridors to federal land owned by the Bureau of Land Management and to the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. Total land including the purchase of 34 ranches is as big as the State of Connecticut or the size of Yellowstone and Glacier National Parks combined. Adjacent is the Fort Belknap Reservation where the Nakoda and the Aaniiih manage a range with more than a thousand bison so building a tourist destination helps economic development for the entire region.

But, since Republicans seized power in Montana they've argued Yellowstone National Park is neglecting its commitments to managing the park’s bison population in order to decrease the spread of brucellosis to cattle despite knowing wapiti spread it to cattle far more often than bison do. In Montana, the Department of Livestock is the governing arm for bison that leave the protections of the park.  

Chico Hot Springs hosted the annual meeting for the Interagency Bison Membership Plan where bellicose welfare ranchers insisted YNP isn't doing enough to kill off America's National Mammal.
Yellowstone’s Lead Bison Biologist Chris Geremia told officials at the meeting that a harsh winter brought more than 1,000 animals outside of the park into the Gardiner Basin. The herd was reduced by around 25 percent: more than 1000 of them were removed by the tribal and state hunt, 282 were entered into a program that transfers bison to tribal nations, and 88 bison were slaughtered, their meat and hides given to tribes. IBMP voting member and Custer Gallatin National Forest Supervisor Mary Erickson, says from her vantage point having served on the IBMP for the past 16 years, bison management has always been complex and controversial, but over the years the group has made a lot of progress. [Yellowstone Public Radio]
The feds should buy out landowners unwilling to lease for wildlife corridors. Unless the West embraces rewilding on portions of the Missouri River basin west of a north/south line from Oacoma, South Dakota through the CM Russell National Wildlife Refuge to Yellowstone National Park then to the Yukon water wars will clog the courts leaving violent armed vigilantism to settle disputes.

Learn more at the Bozeman Daily Chronicle.

11/3/23

USACE nearing Dakota Excess pipeline decision

Energy Transfer Partners is an Earth hater based in Texas and infamous for brutalizing water protectors near Cannon Ball, North Dakota. 

Mercenaries and National Guard troops used chemical weapons on many of the thousands of peaceful demonstrators camped on federal land near Cannon Ball where some 761 people were arrested between early August, 2016 and late February, 2017. Trump apparatchiks even referred to the American Indians and their compatriots as jihadists and insurgents. In 2017 a US District Court ordered the US Army Corps of Engineers to finish a review of ETP's Dakota Excess pipeline, its impact on tribal interests and how a spill under the Oahe Dam would impact water rights for the Standing Rock, Cheyenne River, Yankton and Oglala Lakota nations. 

Even before Statehood the US Army Corps of Engineers has had purview over water that flows into bodies that can support navigation. In 2020 Justice Department attorney Matthew Marinelli said in a status report to Judge James Boasberg the Corps had met with representatives of each tribe and made progress on their concerns. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe wasn't satisfied and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe created a website to raise funding and awareness for the dispossession of treaty land, natural resources and to provide information about the nation's battles against the Dakota Excess and Keystone XL Pipelines. 

A lawyer for the Corps said they would "finish its consideration and analysis of the information submitted by the tribes and consider issues identified at the meetings with the tribes" by August, 2018 but the Trump Organization ordered the Corps expedite the environmental review and many of the findings available to the public were redacted. 

Public comments were aired Wednesday and Thursday on five options the Corps is considering for the pipeline, including leaving it as is, re-routing it to north of Bismarck or abandoning it.

11/2/23

Feds pouring more money into hole in South Dakota

Naming a dark matter lab 5000 feet below Lead, South Dakota after a lecherous, usurious Republican billionaire sticks in plenty of craws in my home state yet real science is getting done there. 

The Sanford Underground Research Facility in the former Homestake Mine represents 8000 feet closer to the geothermal potential capable of powering much of the region. The US Department of Energy, New Mexico's Sandia Labs, Los Alamos National Laboratory, South Dakota School of Mines and others are collaborating on exploring that limitless potential using Enhanced Geothermal Systems.
“We’re thrilled about DOE’s recent funding announcement for the Center for Understanding Subsurface Signals and Permeability experiment,” said Dr. Jaret Heise, science director at SURF. “We are very happy to garner interest from the DOE’s Energy Earthshots Initiative and to play a role in developing our nation’s energy independence with CUSSP. We are also grateful for the hard work of previous groups of scientists at SURF who opened the door to this new era of energy research here at America’s deep underground laboratory,” says Heise. [Geothermal research at SURF takes leap forward with DOE Energy Earthshots initiative]
Now, the scientists and scholars repopulating Lawrence County could test anchored Republicans. Maybe.

11/1/23

Scholars reinforce arguments in Disqualification Clause

With pristine clarity, Professor Laurence H. Tribe and Dennis Aftergut explain in this @USATODAY essay the compelling case for disqualification of the former president from future "office . . . under the United States" under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment: Simply, he rebelled "against the Constitution of the United States" when, in violation of the Constitution's Executive Vesting Clause, he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election and remain in power, notwithstanding that he had lost that election and the American People had voted instead to confer the Executive power upon his successor, now-President Joseph Biden. This is the issue -- and the only issue -- before the courts in Colorado and Minnesota this week: Did the former president "rebel" against "the Constitution of the United States" when he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election. [Judge J. Michael Luttig]
And.
The authors of Section 3 recognized that another run at office by anyone who had tried to overturn an election in violation of the oath could end the republic. That leaves a paramount question for the courts to answer concerning Trump. What does it mean to engage in “insurrection or rebellion against” the Constitution? It’s important to notice what can be easily missed: The text of Section 3 says exactly that – the disqualifying misconduct is rebellion against the Constitution. That kind of subversion of a fundamental tenet of the Constitution is precisely what the 14th Amendment has to mean by “insurrection or rebellion against” it, the very definition of disqualifying conduct under Section 3. [Ban Trump from 2024 ballot? Why courts should rule he can't serve as president again.]
Learn more at the Colorado Newsline.

Meanwhile, Trump lawyer John Eastman is defending his advice to Mike Pence.