The Colorado ruling, based on “clear and convincing evidence” that Trump engaged in insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, does, in fact, limit voters’ choices, but that is true of other constitutional provisions that disqualify various citizens from holding the Office of the Presidency. But other provisions that seem undemocratic — Article II criteria for presidential eligibility, the Impeachment Clause, the Disqualification Clause of the 14th Amendment and the 22nd Amendment — because they impose limits on the choices of voters, have retained their vitality and relevance in an age marked by grave constitutional challenges. These voter-limiting provisions serve the greater interest of the nation — the necessity of preserving our constitutional democracy. [Wyoming Humanities, Section Three And Constitutional Democracy?]Newcomb claims Trump refused to protect Congress from terrorists.
Joan Donovan is Assistant Professor of Journalism and Emerging Media Studies at Boston University.
Networked incitement involves insurgents communicating across multiple platforms to command and coordinate mobilized social movements in the moment of action. The insurrectionists behaved akin to a networked social movement, with online platforms forming the infrastructure to organize action, but its leaders were politicians and political operatives as opposed to charismatic community leaders. No sitting president before Trump had exploited the capacity of social media to directly reach citizens to command specific actions. The use of social media for networked incitement foreshadows a dark future for democracies. Rulers could well come to power by manipulating mass social movements via social media, directing a movement’s members to serve as the leaders’ shock troops, online and off. [Jan. 6 was an example of networked incitement − a media and disinformation expert explains the danger of political violence orchestrated over social media]Is Trump even well enough to weather the toll his crimes are taking on his health? His lawyers are arguing that a unitary executive could launch the extraordinary rendition or worse of anyone anywhere anytime without due process because he can. But the Supreme Court of the United States is in a box: if it rules the unitary executive is immune to prosecution President Joe Biden could call for the removal of every Republican who incited insurrection. And while Trump is a clear and present danger to national security and his imprisonment at Guantanamo Bay is an intriguing goal house arrest, a gag order and loss of passport is probably adequate if POTUS Biden orders it.
Learn more at the Wyoming Tribune.
https://t.co/3ygsGhvlhl pic.twitter.com/1skzQZyY8q
— Ann Telnaes (@AnnTelnaes) January 19, 2024
Our Gov’t demise is simply a matter of time. 8)
ReplyDeleteDissolution of the US Constitution requires the consent of 3/4 of the states.
ReplyDeleteThe algorithm will destroy us, most likely already has.
DeleteHi Dave, hope all is well with you and yours. Trump’s people are broke, broken, disaffected, debt-ridden, desperate and determined to destroy civil society to wipe their slates clean then string up the bankers who enslaved them so they’re the clear and present danger to the world right now.
ReplyDeleteWe have all been broken left or right. I find the political thing to be theater and the presidency to be just a figurehead to disagree about.(appearance of choice)So glad that I have been steered back to care of the earth and its amazing care of us. 2024 is going to be 🔥 be that good or bad. Living in gratitude and love is the only way forward. Not seeing too many folks with that capacity after all the indoctrination . ☮️
ReplyDeleteDonald Trump represents the worst of America so until he loses his passport and is under house arrest with a gag order nobody is safe.
ReplyDelete