12/26/12

Today's intersection: snow cover and uranium


The Pumpkin Buttes are clearly visible in the upper right-hand corner of this NASA photo as a grey smear just south and east of Bighorn range




Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica:
The outcome could have far-reaching implications, setting a precedent for similar battles sparked by the resurgence of uranium mining in Texas, South Dakota, New Mexico and elsewhere. The Safe Drinking Water Act forbids injecting industrial waste into or above drinking water aquifers, but the EPA issued what are called aquifer exemptions that gave mine operators at the ranch permission to ignore the law. 
"It's disturbing that such a requirement would be so easy to get around," said Jeff Parsons, a senior attorney for the Western Mining Action Project, which is representing the Oglala Sioux in a challenge to stop the Powertech mine. "There is a reason that South Dakota prohibited Class 1 wells; it's to protect the aquifers." As of now, it's unclear how the EPA will answer Wyoming's challenge to its authority at Christensen Ranch.

5 comments:

  1. Now I've got to go see the Pumpkin Buttes... Thanks for the Dakota Light Photography link to The Local Group!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, Nadene! The Pumpkin Buttes are near the headwaters of the Cheyenne, the Bellle Fourche and the Little Missouri, too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Even more to find of interest there. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey, Montana: what about Brian Schweitzer for EPA?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Peabody, Arch Coal, other players in Wyoming coal fields to be investigated: Chicago Tribune.

    ReplyDelete

Republican is simply another word for Earth hater but comments intended to troll the author or other readers will not be published so use a handle or even your real name and don’t be an asshole.